An understanding of my patterns through the theory of drivers
- By Veena BM
February 27, 2023
My Context
There have been many instances in both my life when I have felt tears well up and held them back for fear of being judged by those around me. I downplay “happy situations & achievements” telling myself it is no big deal – almost guilty to feel happy. I have a need to “do” something all the time and then get annoyed and frustrated that people don’t understand me. I find it difficult to say “No” to others.
I have used the concept of drivers to understand the above aspects of myself which show up both personally and professionally. It is an easy to understand idea, and I have been attracted to it from the day I did my TA 101 , my first introduction to Transactional Analysis.
Drivers:
Through Transactional Analysis I realized that there are ways in which I have learnt to adapt to the environment. I developed it at an age when I understood what my parents and significant others approved or disapproved of and hence attempted to adapt to them in order to feel OK about myself. These messages were both verbal (“Don’t cry, you will be seen as weak”, and non-verbal (patted on the back for “being brave” despite a wound).
According to Taibi Kahler, “Drivers are behaviours that last from a split second to no more than seven seconds.” (Kahler, 1975, p.280). He further added that “Drivers are behaviours that reinforce an existential position of “I’m OK if,”” (Kahler, 1975, p.283). He identified five Drivers.
While injunctions tell a child what NOT to do, counter-injunctions tell a child what TO do instead. They are called counter injunctions because they counter or neutralize the pain of injunctions thus providing conditional OKness. These are survival strategies we developed as children to counterbalance the injunction. In contrast to injunctions which originate from the Child ego state of the parent, Counter-injunctions come from the Parent ego state of the parents as these are messages they have received from their parents/parental figures. This is represented in the script matrix (ref Steiner from Scripts People Live) above .
Injunctions and Counter Injunctions have also been visually represented by Adrianne Lee’s image of a drowning man, shown below. It highlights the powerful “sinking” effect injunctions have on us and shows the “pulling” effect of “drivers”, in order to feel we are acceptable. In other words, a person is pulled both ways by what he/she thinks, feels, believes should be doing, how he/she should be living, what his life should mean and all the self-sacrifices he/she must make in order to be OK in the world .
Figure 1: SCRIPT MATRIX
The Origin of My Drivers
Through the above experiences I learnt to supress my feelings as it saved me from reprimand and ridicule. I also learnt to keep doing tasks one after another to keep myself busy as I got appreciated at times and escaped reprimand at other times. I accepted what my parents/ parent like figures told me as it kept me safe.
My drivers & their manifestation:
Be Strong:
.
Try Hard:
Please Others:
My Growth Journey:
Through the understanding of my drivers and the challenges they pose for me, I learnt that by changing my beliefs I would be able to change my behaviour and vice versa. I have begun to see that emotions are not a sign of weakness but a source of health and vitality, e.g., Anger helps me to set boundaries, fear protects me, sadness allows me to grieve the loss of someone, or something & love/joy enable me to experience intimacy with others and the environment. I have taken personal responsibility for my change and begun to experiment with options.
My Working Style:
However, there are certain aspects of my drivers that I would like to retain as they serve me well and in reality, are parental values that I would like to preserve. As Petruska Clarkson in her article in TAJ says, “The aspirations to be fast, energetic, pleasing, strong, and excellent are fine goals, profoundly compatible with a value base that places the fulfilment of human potential as a cornerstone of all its efforts, knowledge, practice, epistemology, and ethics” (Clarkson,1992, p.19).
A few examples are cited below.
Conclusion
I realize now that certain aspects of my drivers emphasize my “I’m not OK, you’re OK” position thus keeping me in script & reinforcing my belief that I do not have a choice with people and circumstances. I would continue conscious efforts to get over them. However, I also see the benefit of being strong & stoic as it provides me with endurance, I can choose to be pleasing without feeling threatened about my very existence, my appetite for experimenting provides me with multiple options. These values give me the flexibility as well as appropriateness in responding to situations enabling me to become more fully myself.
Veena is a talent development leader with two decades of experience across FMCG,Banking, IT and insurance sectors. She is a certified Wrong Thinker and is passionate about helping people discover their true potential. She has completed her Diploma in Transactional analysis and is pursuing her CTA, specializing in Organization Development. She lives in Bangalore with her husband and 11 year old daughter.
Very well written. I can relate myself with my initial days in TA Training.
Drivers are mentioned as Working styles in Organizational TA. Hence we can use them as our tool too.
I love this! I can relate to a lot of your experiences.
I’m about to start my TA certification in Organisational development.